IN A DYNAMIC ORDER OF ACTIONS ONLY SOME EXPECTATIONS CAN BE PROTECTED
In a constantly changing world, not all expectations can be safeguarded by rules. Rather, the fulfillment of expectations is often improved when some expectations are intentionally disappointed. It’s normal to switch partnerships, which may let down others' expectations, but the law focuses on preventing only certain types of harm. This approach allows individuals to pursue their goals based on their own knowledge without unnecessary interference, as the law doesn’t guarantee that no one will disrupt them but rather limits specific actions.
Flexibility is essential in adapting to new knowledge and circumstances. Protecting every expectation would limit people’s ability to adjust their plans when situations change, which is necessary for many expectations to be met. Rather than requiring individuals to stick rigidly to past actions, allowing adjustments leads to a more stable overall order. If everyone adhered strictly to previous expectations, it could create chaos, as changing conditions would often make it impossible for them to fulfill those expectations, spiraling into greater disorder.
Additionally, maintaining an overall order involves discerning which expectations should be protected to maximize fulfillment. While some rules contribute to order, not all do, and ineffective regulations may lead to disorder. The core values that guide behavior are not about specific acts but rather about maintaining a beneficial abstract structure that enables people to pursue diverse and unpredictable goals.
When new situations arise, complementary norms may be needed to achieve desired outcomes as others do not always automatically lead to success. Importantly, understanding how laws fit into existing systems isn’t purely a logical endeavor; it also requires recognizing real-world consequences. Thus, the nature of law is deeply connected to human experience rather than a mere logical framework, emphasizing the interplay between norms and the practical realities they aim to govern.
In a constantly changing world, not all expectations can be safeguarded by rules. Rather, the fulfillment of expectations is often improved when some expectations are intentionally disappointed. It’s normal to switch partnerships, which may let down others' expectations, but the law focuses on preventing only certain types of harm. This approach allows individuals to pursue their goals based on their own knowledge without unnecessary interference, as the law doesn’t guarantee that no one will disrupt them but rather limits specific actions.
Flexibility is essential in adapting to new knowledge and circumstances. Protecting every expectation would limit people’s ability to adjust their plans when situations change, which is necessary for many expectations to be met. Rather than requiring individuals to stick rigidly to past actions, allowing adjustments leads to a more stable overall order. If everyone adhered strictly to previous expectations, it could create chaos, as changing conditions would often make it impossible for them to fulfill those expectations, spiraling into greater disorder.
Additionally, maintaining an overall order involves discerning which expectations should be protected to maximize fulfillment. While some rules contribute to order, not all do, and ineffective regulations may lead to disorder. The core values that guide behavior are not about specific acts but rather about maintaining a beneficial abstract structure that enables people to pursue diverse and unpredictable goals.
When new situations arise, complementary norms may be needed to achieve desired outcomes as others do not always automatically lead to success. Importantly, understanding how laws fit into existing systems isn’t purely a logical endeavor; it also requires recognizing real-world consequences. Thus, the nature of law is deeply connected to human experience rather than a mere logical framework, emphasizing the interplay between norms and the practical realities they aim to govern.