NOT ONLY THE RULES OF JUST CONDUCT, BUT ALSO THE TEST OF THEIR JUSTICE, ARE NEGATIVE
Justice has changed from being about specific outcomes in small tribal societies to a broader idea in open societies, where it depends on universal rules. Legislators who create laws for a large community need to ensure that these laws apply to everyone equally. Justice, in this sense, does not focus on individual interests or specific groups but instead on the consistent application of rules, regardless of the different outcomes that may result.
This change allows societies to function even when individuals do not know everything about every situation. Justice acts as a way to deal with our lack of knowledge about specific facts and focuses on abstract principles instead of personal goals. As society grows, the rules of justice need to stay general and not rely on particular situations that people cannot fully understand.
The creation of just rules comes from a group effort to keep things consistent and improve the systems that have been passed down through generations. Those responsible for writing or changing these rules must consider existing principles and use them to find fair solutions rather than making arbitrary decisions. Their authority comes from their ability to align with what society views as just, not from their personal power.
As society evolves, there will be times when accepted ideas about justice conflict with universal principles. This means that rules might need to be changed. In the end, building a fair society relies more on logical thinking than emotional reactions. Recognizing the complexity of different historical stages helps us understand justice today. Balancing older rules with new ideas is important for society to progress.
Justice has changed from being about specific outcomes in small tribal societies to a broader idea in open societies, where it depends on universal rules. Legislators who create laws for a large community need to ensure that these laws apply to everyone equally. Justice, in this sense, does not focus on individual interests or specific groups but instead on the consistent application of rules, regardless of the different outcomes that may result.
This change allows societies to function even when individuals do not know everything about every situation. Justice acts as a way to deal with our lack of knowledge about specific facts and focuses on abstract principles instead of personal goals. As society grows, the rules of justice need to stay general and not rely on particular situations that people cannot fully understand.
The creation of just rules comes from a group effort to keep things consistent and improve the systems that have been passed down through generations. Those responsible for writing or changing these rules must consider existing principles and use them to find fair solutions rather than making arbitrary decisions. Their authority comes from their ability to align with what society views as just, not from their personal power.
As society evolves, there will be times when accepted ideas about justice conflict with universal principles. This means that rules might need to be changed. In the end, building a fair society relies more on logical thinking than emotional reactions. Recognizing the complexity of different historical stages helps us understand justice today. Balancing older rules with new ideas is important for society to progress.