JUSTICE IS AN ATTRIBUTE OF HUMAN CONDUCT
Justice is related to human actions and conduct, rather than to states of affairs. The term "rules of just conduct" refers to guidelines that help shape a spontaneous order in society, as opposed to rules that focus on organization and government. While some believe that all legislative decisions are about justice, this view is misleading. True justice applies only to human behaviors and requires personal responsibility; mere situations or conditions cannot be defined as just or unjust without human involvement.
There are instances when it is a moral duty to create a certain outcome that may be viewed as just, but this also means the actions taken to achieve it must be moral and permissible. It's important that rules defining just and unjust actions can be correct or incorrect. When a commonly accepted rule proves to be unjust in particular situations, it indicates that the rule itself is flawed or inadequately expresses the concept of justice.
Government actions can be just or unjust, but the evaluation of justice must be guided by accepted standards of conduct rather than by individual case outcomes. In a spontaneous order, which is a result of various individual choices, no strict rules dictate what each person's position should be. Justice cannot be assigned to outcomes that arise without an individual's intention or desire, making the notion of "social" or "distributive" justice meaningless in such contexts. Justice ultimately hinges on human responsibility and actions within a system of established rules.
Justice is related to human actions and conduct, rather than to states of affairs. The term "rules of just conduct" refers to guidelines that help shape a spontaneous order in society, as opposed to rules that focus on organization and government. While some believe that all legislative decisions are about justice, this view is misleading. True justice applies only to human behaviors and requires personal responsibility; mere situations or conditions cannot be defined as just or unjust without human involvement.
There are instances when it is a moral duty to create a certain outcome that may be viewed as just, but this also means the actions taken to achieve it must be moral and permissible. It's important that rules defining just and unjust actions can be correct or incorrect. When a commonly accepted rule proves to be unjust in particular situations, it indicates that the rule itself is flawed or inadequately expresses the concept of justice.
Government actions can be just or unjust, but the evaluation of justice must be guided by accepted standards of conduct rather than by individual case outcomes. In a spontaneous order, which is a result of various individual choices, no strict rules dictate what each person's position should be. Justice cannot be assigned to outcomes that arise without an individual's intention or desire, making the notion of "social" or "distributive" justice meaningless in such contexts. Justice ultimately hinges on human responsibility and actions within a system of established rules.