The discussion of success in social policy has become increasingly relevant due to the changing role of government in America over the past several decades. Historically, social policy was not a major concern for the federal government, which focused on the economy and basic functions like settling disputes between states. However, from the New Deal through the 1970s, the U.S. developed a complex set of social policies addressing welfare, education, health, and more. This shift raises important questions about how to measure success in these areas.
Simply fighting poverty, discrimination, or inequality is generally accepted as good, but measuring progress is complicated. For example, a decline in poverty does not necessarily mean overall progress if other social issues worsen at the same time. It’s essential to consider the broader impact of policies, such as the long-term effects of food stamps or laws against discrimination. Ultimately, the true goal of these policies should align with promoting happiness and well-being rather than just addressing immediate needs. Understanding the purpose behind social policies is key to evaluating their success.
The Declaration of Independence emphasizes that the pursuit of happiness is a fundamental right and purpose of government. The Founders believed happiness is central to human existence and a key reason for having government. They argued that government’s role is to ensure and enhance the happiness of its citizens, reflecting a common understanding among educated people of that time. Happiness, however, was never specifically defined; it was understood as the ultimate good that people seek for its own sake, not just for other benefits it may bring. This idea applies to various goods, including political and ethical values. The thinkers of the 18th century recognized the need for an ultimate end to all pursuits, which they labeled as happiness, without needing to specify what that happiness entailed.
Happiness is often misunderstood today, being linked to self-centeredness and the pursuit of personal pleasure. Many believe that society's focus on individual happiness distracts from higher, more meaningful goals. However, traditional ideas suggest that happiness is the ultimate good, necessary for a fulfilling life. It implies that pursuing happiness is an essential part of being human and involves seeking the best understanding of what "the good" means. Even figures like Mother Teresa pursue happiness through service, while superficial goals, like acquiring luxury cars, show a lack of true understanding. Ultimately, the role of government is to support citizens in their pursuit of happiness, recognizing it as a fundamental human duty.
The focus is on the idea of pursuing happiness in connection with social policy, rather than trying to measure happiness itself. It argues that we shouldn't use numbers or indexes to figure out if policies make people happy, like using catalytic converters to reduce pollution. Instead, thinking about the pursuit of happiness gives us a fresh way to look at social policies. While people might face difficulties that make it hard to chase happiness, like being poor, the government should not stop anyone from trying to find fulfillment in their lives. Achieving happiness is a personal journey and may not always lead to exactly what someone wants, but society can help create conditions that allow for a meaningful and satisfying life.